emBRACE

Building Resilience Amongst Communities in Europe

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Italiano

emBRACE was a 4-year EC’s (European Commission) FP7 project with the aim to improve community resilience in the context of disasters in Europe. To reach this aim, the project developed a resilience framework and methods for the evaluation of resilience that integrated non-structural measures such as the political context, risk governance, the institutional cooperation and communication aspects. 

Based on the theoretical framework project partners developed indicators that allows to measure resilience towards natural hazards. The developed methodology was tested and ground-truthed by means of 6 well-chosen case studies across Europe, exposed to different natural hazards, situated in different governance settings and socio-demographic-economic contexts.

Eurac Research was one of 10 project partners coming from 6 European countries. Eurac Research was responsible for the development of resilience indicators and for the Alpine case study that had its focus on risk perception and risk management. Within this study, Eurac Research carried out a population survey in the aftermath of a landslide event in Badia as well as interviews with key risk management actors.

Publications
Structured output methods and environmental issues: perspectives on co-created bottom-up and ‘sideways’ science
Taylor R, Forrester J, Pedoth L, Zeitlyn D (2022)
Journal article
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications

More information: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01304-3

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01304-3

Disaster Impact and Land Use Data Analysis in the Context of a Resilience‐Relevant Footprint
Pregnolato M, Petitta M, Schneiderbauer S (2018)
Contribution in book
Framing Community Disaster Resilience: resources, capacities, learning and action

More information: https://www.wiley.com/en-ad/Framing+Community+Disaster+Resil ...

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166047.ch7

https://hdl.handle.net/10863/8728

The role of risk perception and community networks in preparing for and responding to landslides: a Dolomite case study
Pedoth L, Taylor R, Kofler C, Stawinoga A, Forrester J, Matin N, Schneiderbauer S (2018)
Contribution in book
Framing Community Disaster Resilience: resources, capacities, learning and action

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166047.ch13

https://hdl.handle.net/10863/7853

Wicked Problems: Resilience, Adaptation, and Complexity
Forrester J, Taylor R, Pedoth L, Matin N (2018)
Contribution in book
Framing Community Disaster Resilience: resources, capacities, learning and action

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166047.ch5

https://hdl.handle.net/10863/7856

Framing Community Disaster Resilience: resources, capacities, learning and action
Deeming H, Fordham M, Kuhlicke C, Pedoth L, Schneiderbauer S, Shreve C (2018)
Wiley-Blackwell
978-1-119-16596-5
Edited book

More information: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/97811191660 ...

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166047

https://hdl.handle.net/10863/7852

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Indicators for Assessing Community Resilience to Natural Hazards
Becker D, Schneiderbauer S, Forrester J, Pedoth L (2018)
Contribution in book
Framing Community Disaster Resilience: resources, capacities, learning and action

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166047.ch10

https://hdl.handle.net/10863/7855

The emBRACE resilience framework: developing an integrated framework for evaluating community resilience to natural hazards
Kruse S, Abeling T, Deming H, Fordham M, Forrester J, Jülich S, Karanci N A, Kuhlicke C, Pelling M, Pedoth L, Schneiderbauer S, Sharpe J (2018)
Contribution in book
Framing Community Disaster Resilience: resources, capacities, learning and action

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166047.ch6

https://hdl.handle.net/10863/8419

Our partners