Institutes & Centers

Institute for Renewable Energy - News & Events - Industrialised off-site building renovation VS traditional retrofit

24 January 24

Industrialised off-site building renovation VS traditional retrofit

Eurac Research recently published a new scientific paper focusing on the comparison between two equally performing retrofits scenarios for an existing building in Italy.

  • English

The scientific work, recently published on the special issue of the Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, aims at analytically evaluating the building deep retrofit implemented with a traditional and an industrialized approach.

The economic competitiveness for deep retrofit actions between the industrialised off-site and the traditional on-site approaches are compared by using a comparative Life Cycle Costing (LCC) analysis. This assessment was based on a deep analysis of all renovation-related cost and timing processes, from design to operation and maintenance phases.

The retrofit interventions considered in this work, refer to an existing building in Italy undergoing a deep renovation. The building examined is the Italian demo case of the project INFINITE.

The results show that in 50 years, the two deep retrofit approaches are comparable in terms of investment costs, even if a gap of around -7% and +16% still exists. There is the possibility to reduce this gap with the market uptake of the technological solutions. In addition to that, the possibility to re-use some dismantled components in the industrialised scenario contribute in a relevant way to increase the final value of such an approach.

"Eurac’s team has followed the entire process from the definition of the methodology, through the primary data colletion and elaboration, until the modelling and results analysis. Valuable support was given by the INFINITE partners, especially in providing costs data" explains researcher Martino Gubert talking about the role of Eurac Research and the support of the research partners in the entire work."The added value of this paper to the scientific community is the definition of a first costs analysis along the whole life cycle between the two approaches, while keeping the same level of performances" says Gubert.

There is still a lot to do in order to reduce the cost share of the industrialised solutions, first of all the reduction of the material costs. However, the operation and maintenance phase has shown to be key to transforming the expected higher quality of the industrialised components into a prolonged life expectance.

Read the original scientific article here

Related Case Studies
1 - 4

2021Multi-family house, Campi di Bisenzio, Firenze

Development of an energy-active, cost-effective envelope that is adaptable to the architectural needs of the building. ...

2021Multi-family house, Bagnolo in Piano, Reggio Emilia

Development of a multifunctional retrofit toolkit including different components (ICT, BEMS, HVAC, BIPV and Envelope ...

2020Housing complex, Aslago street, Bolzano

The municipality of Bolzano has carried out a complete refurbishment of social housing apartment complexes. The ...

2021Multi-family house, Haugerudsenter, Oslo

This refurbishment project, managed by Boligbygg, involved improving the façade using prefabricated modules with ...

Related Tools & Services
1 - 3

2023Accredited calculation of thermal transmittance of windows, doors and shutter boxes

The Renewable Energy Institute performs accredited calculations on thermal transmittance of windows, doors and shutters ...

2021Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) optimisation tool

The “BIPV optimization tool” suggests the optimal configuration of a PV system to be integrated in a building or group ...

2022BuiltHub: Web-based building knowledge platform

The web-based building stock data platform developed in the ...

Other News & Events

1 - 10