Rethinking Courts in Federal Systems: A Comparative Approach

In the evolving field of comparative constitutional law, one persistent challenge has been the development of theories that are both broadly explanatory and finely attuned to the unique features of individual systems. This tension—between generality and specificity—is especially pronounced in the study of federal systems and the role of courts within them. In a [paper](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5338955) prepared for the [Federal Scholar in Residence Program](https://www.eurac.edu/en/institutes-centers/institute-for-comparative-federalism/pages/federal-scholar-in-residence-program) at the Institute for Comparative Federalism, I seek to offer a fresh and methodologically rigorous approach to this issue, by proposing a conceptual framework to help us understand and meaningfully compare judicial reasoning and constitutional disputes in federations.

Access work

https://www.eurac.edu/en/blogs/eureka/rethinking-courts-in-federal-systems-a-comparative-approach