"Alte" und "neue" Minderheiten: Regionale Synergien, Unterschiede und Perspektiven
Crepaz, K
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5656755
Accommodating religious, linguistic and cultural diversity while at the same time ensuring cohesion and shared standards of living together are some of the biggest challenges that modern societies face. Most European countries have had heterogeneous population structures throughout their history, as frequent wars left minority groups on both sides of newly established borders. Due to a history of minority persecution and assimilation, most European states have nowadays implemented minority protection policies for historic minority communities. “Respect for and protection of minorities” is part of the Copenhagen Criteria for EU accession, and “respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities” is outlined as one of the EU’s founding values in Article 2 TEU. While protection measures for “old” minority groups are thus firmly rooted in national and international provisions, no stable system for integrating diversity originating from the most recent migratory flows has been established yet. Minorities and migrant groups are regarded as a dichotomy, and largely studied in isolation from each other, when in fact migrant integration frameworks could benefit immensely from the vast experience of minority protection policy and research. The present project aims to bridge this gap, by investigating the under-researched field of claims made by migrants, and comparing them to those of historic minority groups. It poses the following main research question: Which rights and protection systems developed for old minorities could be beneficially extended to new minorities? In order to provide answers to this question, we first have to collect the claims made by “new” minorities, and analyze them in comparison to those of “old” minorities, looking at similarities and differences. If there are claims shared by both groups, those will then be evaluated regarding the necessary framework conditions for extending some of the provisions applied to “old” minorities to migrant groups. The project makes an important contribution to both migration and minority research, and provides the scholarly foundation for a new more comprehensive approach to dealing with linguistic, cultural and religious diversity.
Discover
Verwandte Expertinnen und Experten, Publikationen und Forschungsthemen ansehen.
Eurac Research ist ein privates Forschungszentrum mit Sitz in Bozen, Südtirol. Unsere Forscherinnen und Forscher kommen aus allen Teilen der Welt und arbeiten in vielen verschiedenen Disziplinen. Gemeinsam widmen sie sich dem, was ihr Beruf und ihre Berufung ist – Zukunft zu gestalten.

Unsere Forschung befasst sich mit den größten Herausforderungen, vor denen wir in Zukunft stehen: Menschen brauchen Gesundheit, Energie, gut funktionierende politische und soziale Systeme und ein intaktes Umfeld. Dies sind komplexe Fragen, und wir suchen nach Antworten in der Interaktion zwischen vielen verschiedenen Disziplinen. [Über uns](/de/ueber-uns-eurac-research)
Eurac Research Headquarter
Viale Druso 1
39100 Bolzano
Italy
Eurac Research NOI Techpark
Via A.-Volta
39100 Bolzano
Italy
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Crepaz, K
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5656755
Crepaz K
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5656645
Crepaz K
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5656767
Crepaz K
Civil society has become an active player in the public reception and handling of the ‘refugee crisis’, especially through the use of social media. People willing to engage are able to connect in a low-threshold, local, and interactive way, while also keeping connected to similar movements in other EU countries. This process of connection and collaboration can be regarded as an instance of ‘bottom-up’ Europeanization processes, in which national and subnational actors work together transnationally to reach a common goal. Social media as fora for exchange allow efficient communication, present a possibility to directly lobby the decision makers (e.g. local politicians), and provide an apt tool for the planning of collective actions. The internet offers de-securitising forces a forum for presenting alternative discourses on migration, contributing to de-securitisation processes by moving away from the predominant framing of migration as a threat. The present paper therefore aims to look at ‘bottom-up’ Europeanization and new possibilities for collaboration through the internet as a transnational, de-securitising open forum for discussion. A group of civil society pro-refugee activists in South Tyrol (Northern Italy) and their transnational activities will serve as a case study.
DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851471
Weitere Informationen: 10.5281/zenodo.5656767
Weitere Informationen: 10.5281/zenodo.5656645
Conference: 'Old' and 'new' minorities - Regional synergies, differences and perspectives | Bolzano/online | 4.11.2021 - 4.11.2021
Weitere Informationen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NPtRmSIKUA