Introduction: Squaring the Circle: Critical Reflections on Religious Minorities, Diversity Governance and Pluralist Societies
Medda-Windischer R, Wonisch K, Budabin AC
DOI: 10.1163/9789004446816_002
This project seeks to reflect on the nexus between freedom of religion and legal protection and promotion of religious minority rights in Europe. This focus is based on the consideration that many legal instruments for minority protection have been conceived and traditionally applied mainly for linguistic minorities although these instruments are potentially applicable to religious minorities too. The project aims to bridge academic ´circles`, in particular those linked to religious studies and minority studies, strengthening their potentials. Within the context of diversity governance and integrated societies, our research focuses on five different aspects: First, we provide on a theoretical level a critical assessment of the legal protection and promotion of religious minority rights in Europe, identifying weak and strong points. A special attention will be given to the study of minority rights instruments such as the FCNM and the UN Declaration on Minorities for the protection of religious minorities and the accommodation of religious diversity. Second, we seek to reflect on the nexus of general principles of human and minority rights, European values and the power of religion in promoting common values and synergies to create social cohesion. Third, we analyze whether it is beneficial and meaningful to compare and extend to religious migrant communities policies, institutional accommodations and legal frameworks conceived by and/or for old religious groups. Fourth, we focus on the governance of intra-religious, in particular Islamic diversity within the European context aiming to develop an egalitarian approach to govern intra-religious, in particular Islamic diversity in a liberal-democratic State. And finally, as a fifth component, we analyze the potential of religious normative orders and pluralist constitutional arrangements as a means of accommodating religious diversity and as tool to address claims of religious minorities. In our analyzes we specifically focus on claims of, and the impact of pluralist legal frameworks on the position of vulnerable members of religious communities.
Discover
See related experts, publications, and research topics.
Eurac Research is a private research center based in Bolzano (South Tyrol) with researchers from a wide variety of scientific fields who come from all over the globe. Together, through scientific knowledge and research, they share the goal of shaping the future.

Our research addresses the greatest challenges facing us in the future: people need health, energy, well-functioning political and social systems and an intact environment. These are complex questions, and we are seeking the answers in the interaction between many different disciplines. [About us](/en/about-us-eurac-research)
Eurac Research Headquarter
Viale Druso 1
39100 Bolzano
Italy
Eurac Research NOI Techpark
Via A.-Volta
39100 Bolzano
Italy
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Medda-Windischer R, Wonisch K, Budabin AC
DOI: 10.1163/9789004446816_002
Medda-Windischer R, Wonisch K, Budabin AC
ISBN: 978-90-04-44680-9
The accommodation of religious diversity in contemporary pluralist societies is undoubtedly amongst the most salient issues on today’s political agenda, not least due to the challenges posed by migration. A subject of considerable debate is how to reconcile the demands of religious and cultural diversity alongside political unity, that is, how to create a political community that is cohesive and stable and satisfies the legitimate aspirations of minorities. This volume provides a critical analysis of the institutional accommodations and legal frameworks conceived by and/or for historical religious groups and assesses their potential and shortcomings in providing for an integrated society based on human- and minority rights protection.
DOI: 10.1163/9789004446816
Medda-Windischer R
DOI: 10.24989/0014-2492-2021-12-36
Ferrari S, Wonisch K, Medda-Windischer R
DOI: 10.3390/rel12090689
More information: https://ijrf.org/index.php/home/issue/view/vol19-1
More information: https://ijrf.org/index.php/home/issue/view/vol19-1
More information: https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr.3513