Linguistic diversity of new minorities in Europe: A crossroads of rights and duties
Medda-Windischer R, Zeba M
Progetto: EDIS - Vecchie e nuove minoranze
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18845602
Research Group Leader
Institute for Minority Rights
Main Research Foci :
Dr. Roberta Medda-Windischer (LL.M, PhD), Senior Researcher and Group Leader for Equality and Diversity in Integrated Societies at Eurac Research Institute for Minority Rights (Bolzano/Bozen – Italy), is an international lawyer specializing in the international law of minority rights, minority issues, old and new minorities, diversity governance, civic education, non-discrimination policies. Dr. Medda-Windischer worked as Legal Officer for various international organisations, including the European Court of Human Rights (CoE/ECHR, Strasbourg), the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR, BiH), the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE/ODIHR, Albania), and the UN Centre for Human Rights (OHCHR, Geneva). Her research on minority protection includes the authorship and editorship of monographs and multi-authored volumes, as well as numerous articles and book chapters published both in Italy and internationally.
Eurac Research è un centro di ricerca privato con sede a Bolzano, Alto Adige. I nostri ricercatori e le nostre ricercatrici provengono da una vasta gamma di discipline scientifiche e da tutte le parti del globo. Insieme si dedicano a quella che è la loro professione e vocazione – plasmare il futuro.

La nostra ricerca affronta le maggiori sfide che ci attendono in futuro: le persone hanno bisogno di salute, energia, sistemi politici e sociali ben funzionanti e un ambiente intatto. Sono domande complesse a cui cerchiamo di dare risposta grazie all'interazione tra molte discipline diverse. [Chi siamo](/it/chi-siamo-eurac-research)
Eurac Research Headquarter
Viale Druso 1
39100 Bolzano
Italy
Eurac Research NOI Techpark
Via A.-Volta
39100 Bolzano
Italy
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Medda-Windischer R, Zeba M
Progetto: EDIS - Vecchie e nuove minoranze
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18845602
Medda-Windischer R, Crepaz K
Progetto: EDIS - Vecchie e nuove minoranze
This chapter discusses the growing importance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems across different areas of human life, and subsequent concerns about these new technologies exhibiting biased or even discriminatory behaviour, especially in contexts where multiple dimensions of diversity, such as gender, colour, religion or ethnicity, overlap. Using Kimberlé Crenshaw's (1989) concept of intersectionality as our main framework and adding perspectives from current legal and social science discourses, we argue that discriminatory AI is a human-made problem and can therefore only be tackled through a human-centred approach. This approach includes discussing protected attributes and their (in)stability, vulnerability, and essentialist versus non-essentialist attribution of group identity, as well as focusing on human-made inequalities and power imbalances, with a special attention to minority women, as the source for biased AI systems. AI models are biased and discriminatory because our society structures are as well; solutions only addressing technological challenges therefore fall short of tackling the underlying issue of inequalities. The chapter analyses the EU AI Act and the European Centre for Algorithmic Transparency as possible strategies for mitigating discriminatory effects through AI governance and conclude that successfully creating fair AI will not be possible without addressing the societal roots of its discriminatory behaviour.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003510161-13
Medda-Windischer R, Budabin AC, Madera A
Il contributo esamina il complesso panorama delle minoranze religiose in diversi contesti geografici e giuridici, e l'impatto dell'emergenza generata dalla pandemia di Covid-19, da una prospettiva giuridica, concentrandosi su materiali legislativi e giurisprudenziali. Dopo un'introduzione sulla natura fluida della nozione di minoranza religiosa, l'analisi si struttura attorno a dicotomie tematiche che evidenziano tensioni tra interessi contrapposti, come l'autorità religiosa contro quella laica e la salute pubblica contro l'autonomia religiosa. Le aree di interesse specifico riguardano le esenzioni a favore delle pratiche religiose, il ruolo degli accomodamenti religiosi nelle istituzioni pubbliche e le implicazioni delle pratiche religiose come sepolture e funerali sulle misure di protezione della salute pubblica. Il contributo affronta inoltre il conflitto tra attività secolari e religiose, con riguardo ai divieti di assembramento, e alle preoccupazioni relative alla privacy delle informazioni sensibili rispetto alle esigenze di salute pubblica. Infine, questo lavoro affronta la questione della ricerca di capri espiatori e dello sviluppo di forme di hate speech in relazione alla libertà di espressione. Infine, valuta le pratiche positive e i potenziali abusi nella consultazione e nella collaborazione con le minoranze religiose. Le conclusioni mettono a confronto diversi approcci giudiziari alle norme precauzionali relative al COVID-19, e si concentrano sul coinvolgimento delle comunità di fede come approccio più efficace per gestire le emergenze sanitarie, sostenendo il riconoscimento delle minoranze religiose come alleate piuttosto che come avversarie nel contesto di una crisi.
DOI: 10.54103/1971-8543/30023
Medda-Windischer R, Maino Federica
Progetto: EDIS - Vecchie e nuove minoranze
This chapter aims to explore which lessons can be learnt from minoritized communities living in rural areas as applicable to linguistic, religious and cultural minorities likewise. Minoritized rural communities have strong bonds with their own territory and these bonds are characterized by diversity and resilience. Rural areas are often, though not always, characterized by depopulation, lack of essential services, topographic and climatic restrictions, and accordingly, when these features are present, they are considered ‘less-favoured areas’ (LFA) characterized by ‘marginality’. The approach applied in this contribution is based on cross-fertilization in terms of both the construction of synergies and sharing of common solutions among linguistic, religious and cultural minorities, on the one hand, and minoritized rural communities, on the other. This approach is particularly promising as it provides new insights on common issues such as minoritizing processes related to vulnerability and marginalization, multiple and intersectoral grouping and individual’s be Andreoli longing, asymmetry in access to power, empowerment and participation. By encompassing different marginalized groups, this contribution aims to promote solution-oriented and need-based decisions, conflicts as opportunities for change, while at the same time, emphasizing concerted processes to support structural changes.
DOI: 10.4324/9781032661780-7
Kofler D, Medda-Windischer R, Carlà A
Progetto: EDIS - Dispositivi didattici su Diversitá, Anti-discriminazione e Minoranze
Das Zusammenleben in Europa basiert auf einem wirtschaftlichen und politischen Integrationsprojekt und bildet eine Wertegemeinschaft, die Mitgestaltung erfordert, um Bestand zu haben. Das Brettspiel The House of Common Values – Das Haus der gemein-samen Werte (Medda-Windischer et al., 2020a) präsentiert nicht nur die dreizehn Werte der Charta der Grundrechte der EU, sondern lädt auch ein, diese im Alltag zu diskutieren, spielerisch zu erkunden, in Frage zu stellen und inhaltlich weiterzuentwickeln. Asylsuchende und Studierende der Bildungswissenschaften im Primarbereich trafen sich an Spieltischen und berichteten im Anschluss von ihren Erfahrungen. Das Thema der zivilgesellschaftlichen Integration, die inklusiv und differenzsensibel ist, bildet das übergeordnete Ziel der Überlegungen in diesem Beitrag. Sie kann nicht nur rational geplant werden, sondern will gelebt sein, eben im Spannungsfeld zwischen Verordnungen und Partizipation.
DOI: 10.13124/9788860461964_12
Medda-Windischer R, Zeba M, Carlà A, Budabin AC, Patti Y
Andrea Carlà, Roberta Medda-Windischer, Alexandra Budabin, Mattia Zeba
Progetto: EDIS - De-Radicalizzazione in Europa e oltre: Individuare, risolvere, reintegrare
ISBN: 978-88-941951-1-8
Medda-Windischer R, Kössler K
DOI: 10.3726/b18969
Medda-Windischer R, Carlà A
Progetto: EDIS - Dispositivi didattici su Diversitá, Anti-discriminazione e Minoranze
In den letzten Jahren ist die sogenannte Flüchtlingskrise in vielen europäischen Ländern zu einem strukturellen Merkmal geworden. Infolgedessen hat sich der Schwerpunkt der politischen Maßnahmen gegenüber Flüchtlingen von Fragen der Not- und Erstaufnahme zur Thematik der Maßnahmen zu deren Integration verlagert. In den letzten zehn Jahren sind in vielen europäischen Ländern Maßnahmen zur bürgerlichen Integration in Mode gekommen. Den Programmen zur staatsbürgerlichen Integration zufolge sind Kurse und Schulungen, in denen Migranten die Sprache und die Werte des Aufnahmelandes, wie Demokratie und Menschenrechte, erlernen, ein wichtiges Instrument für den Prozess der Eingliederung der Migrantenbevölkerung. Es besteht jedoch Skepsis gegenüber den auf nationaler Ebene entwickelten Programmen zur staatsbürgerlichen Integration, die als unidirektional, disziplinierend und ausgrenzend kritisiert worden sind. Der vorliegende Beitrag befasst sich mit dem Zusammenspiel dieser Dynamiken und stellt die Ergebnisse des von der EU finanzierten Projekts "Euroregionen, Migration und Integration" (EUMINT) vor, das darauf abzielt, ein europaweites Programm zur staatsbürgerlichen Integration von Asylbewerbern, Flüchtlingen und der lokalen Bevölkerung zu entwickeln, und gleichzeitig versucht, einige der Probleme anzugehen, die diesen Arten von Initiativen zugeschrieben werden. EUMINT, das das Konzept der bürgerlichen Integration neu formuliert, verwendet einen partizipatorischen Bottom-up-Ansatz, aktives Lernen und innovatives interaktives didaktisches Material, um Begegnungen zur bürgerlichen Integration zu organisieren, bei denen Flüchtlinge, Asylbewerber und Mitglieder der lokalen Bevölkerung die Schlüsselwerte der Europäischen Union (Artikel 2 des Vertrags über die Europäische Union - EUV) diskutieren. Auf der Grundlage von Teilnehmerbefragungen werden in diesem Artikel die Ergebnisse solcher Begegnungen in Österreich und Italien (Tirol, Südtirol und Friaul-Julisch-Venetien) vorgestellt und bewertet, inwieweit sie das Bewusstsein für die EU-Werte erfolgreich gefördert haben.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-66978-5_40
Medda-Windischer R, Wonisch K, Budabin AC
Progetto: EDIS - Minoranze religiose
DOI: 10.1163/9789004446816_002
Medda-Windischer R, Wonisch K, Budabin AC
Progetto: EDIS - Minoranze religiose
ISBN: 978-90-04-44680-9
The accommodation of religious diversity in contemporary pluralist societies is undoubtedly amongst the most salient issues on today’s political agenda, not least due to the challenges posed by migration. A subject of considerable debate is how to reconcile the demands of religious and cultural diversity alongside political unity, that is, how to create a political community that is cohesive and stable and satisfies the legitimate aspirations of minorities. This volume provides a critical analysis of the institutional accommodations and legal frameworks conceived by and/or for historical religious groups and assesses their potential and shortcomings in providing for an integrated society based on human- and minority rights protection.
DOI: 10.1163/9789004446816
Medda-Windischer R
Progetto: EDIS - Vecchie e nuove minoranze
DOI: 10.5771/9783748933113-483
Medda-Windischer R
Progetto: EDIS - Vecchie e nuove minoranze
“We are all in this together!”: this has been the commonly used, and perhaps rhetorical, slogan repeated throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. It was, however, immediately clear that, in reality, we were, and we are still, not in this together—at least not in the same way. The Covid-19 emergency measures (lockdown, social distancing, health prescriptions, etc.) have had indeed a more pervasive negative effect on most vulnerable categories of our societies, in particular many minority groups.
DOI: 10.1163/22116117_005